Message-ID: <17507161.1075859134075.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 06:48:07 -0800 (PST)
From: d..steffes@enron.com
To: l..nicolay@enron.com, marcus.nettelton@enron.com, dana.davis@enron.com, 
	elizabeth.sager@enron.com
Subject: RE: UI Termination
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEFFE>
X-To: Miller, Don (Asset Mktg) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dmille2>, Nicolay, Christi L. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cnicola>, Nettelton, Marcus </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mnettelt>, Davis, Mark Dana </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mdavis>, Sager, Elizabeth </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Esager>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Elizabeth_Sager_Jan2002\Sager, Elizabeth\Inbox
X-Origin: Sager-E
X-FileName: esager (Non-Privileged).pst

No.  I guess the question I have now is if NSTAR and UI have terminated, do we still need to keep EPMI in the NEPOOL market?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Don (Asset Mktg) 
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nettelton, Marcus; Davis, Mark Dana
Subject: UI Termination



Do we need to do anything special in terms of notification to NEPOOL as it relates to the 1/1/02 termination of UI?

Thanks,

Don 713-412-8967 cell