Message-ID: <22512251.1075859539024.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 05:53:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drusso@reliantenergy.com
To: elizabeth.sager@enron.com
Subject: Re: WSPP issue
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: drusso@reliantenergy.com
X-To: Elizabeth.sager@enron.com
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Elizabeth_Sager_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Sager-E
X-FileName: esager.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Dianne H Russo/TTG/HouInd on 11/30/2000
01:52 PM ---------------------------


Dianne H Russo
11/30/2000 01:48 PM

To:   Shari.Stack@enron.com
cc:   Seger

Subject:  Re: WSPP issue  (Document link: Dianne H Russo)

What do you think of Schedule M to the EEI ?
Should we propose that it ---or something like it be considered ?
Since it is part of EEI, I am sure certain people will oppose it but for
the same reason might want a WSPP version.
Thoughts ?