Message-ID: <6443205.1075859600936.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 05:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeffrey.hodge@enron.com
To: peter.keohane@enron.com
Subject: Re: Pacific Gas & Electric Payments
Cc: cheryl.dawes@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, sharon.crawford@enron.com, 
	william.bradford@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: cheryl.dawes@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, sharon.crawford@enron.com, 
	william.bradford@enron.com
X-From: Jeffrey T Hodge
X-To: Peter Keohane
X-cc: Cheryl Dawes, Elizabeth Sager, Sharon Crawford, William S Bradford
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Elizabeth_Sager_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Sager-E
X-FileName: esager.nsf

Peter:

This note will confirm my voice mail to you.  I have spoken with LeBoeuf on 
this and I think we are all right here.  Remember that PG&E is responsible to 
pay post-filing, but pre-termination gas bills as post-petition obligations.  
That would explain somewhat the action taken by PG&E since the filing was 
made on April 6.  I do not think there would be a problem in sending a letter 
that would reserve our position as to the remainder of the pre-petition 
invoice, but would leave that up to you.  If you decide to go in that 
direction, I would like an opportunity to take a look at that letter.

Trust all else is well.

Jeff



	Peter Keohane
	06/05/2001 10:29 AM
		 
		 To: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Pacific Gas & Electric Payments

I am just again following up as to what we should do with these partially 
paid invoices.  I would want to be careful that we do not set a precedent for 
accepting less than full payment.  Peter.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 06/05/2001 09:22 
AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources 
	Canada Corp. 
	
	From:  Peter Keohane                           05/30/2001 08:13 AM
	

To: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey 
T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Pacific Gas & Electric Payments

Just to follow up, what should we do to address partial payments of our 
invoices.

Peter.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 05/30/2001 08:02 
AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources 
	Canada Corp. 
	
	From:  Peter Keohane                           05/28/2001 10:25 AM
	

To: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey 
T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Pacific Gas & Electric Payments

Please see attached note re: payments by PG&E post-insolvency.  Please call 
to let us know how to handle.  Peter.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 05/28/2001 10:18 
AM ---------------------------


Cheryl Dawes
05/28/2001 09:51 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Pacific Gas & Electric Payments

Hi Peter

Pacific Gas and Electric paid us for gas purchases on May 25 for April 
production.
They paid amounts larger than the post bankruptcy invoice totals. 


Here are the details:

1. Pre Bankruptcy invoice for April 1-12 deliveries.

  4136SA   852,780.50 US

  Payment Rec'd  458,687.37 US

 It appears that they paid 53.787% of the pre bankruptcy invoice.


2. Pre Bankruptcy invoices for April 1-12 deliveries

  4120SA   2,033,749.68 CDN
  4138SA   2,797,179.00 CDN
     ------------------
  Subtotal  4,830,928.68 CDN

 Post Bankruptcy invoices for Apr 13-30 deliveries

  4139SA   3,425,804.71 CDN


 Total all sales for April production

     8,256,733.39 CDN

  Payment Rec'd  6,024,238.66 CDN


 It appears that they paid 53.787% of the pre bankruptcy invoice.


Please let me know what you want me to do with the excess payment.
Thanks
Cheryl