Message-ID: <3347670.1075853447961.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 08:41:00 -0700 (PDT) From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com To: lcw4@pge.com Subject: RE: PG&E and Enron Standstill Agreement Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Elizabeth Sager X-To: "Witalis, Lawrence (Law)" @ENRON X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Elizabeth_Sager_Nov2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: Sager-E X-FileName: esager.nsf In accordance with my voice mail, here is a revised standstill that incorporates the concept I referred to in my voice mail. Please give me a call after you've had a chance to review. Thanks Elizabeth Sager 713 853 6349 "Witalis, Lawrence (Law)" 05/08/2001 02:38 PM To: "'Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com'" cc: "Anderson, David W (Law)" , "Pearce, Karola (Law)" Subject: RE: PG&E and Enron Canadian Gas Master Elizabeth: Good to hear from you. David Anderson is immersed in the agreement, and he should be the one youwork with on it (415-973-6659; dwa@pge.com). By the way, we seem to have stalled a bit on finalizing the stand-still agreement, which, as I last understood it, had only one remaining issue, namely, the wording of the drawing provision for the LCs. Can we get that one behind us, also? Thanks. Larry -----Original Message----- From: Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com [mailto:Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 6:24 AM To: LCW4@pge.com Subject: RE: PG&E and Enron Canadian Gas Master Hi Larry I spoke with Peter Keohane and Mark Powell from our Canadian office and they would be available at any time today, Tues the 8th , to go over the Canadian Gas Master between ECC and PG&E. Let me know what time works for you. Thanks Elizabeth 713 853 6349