Message-ID: <8909897.1075859548811.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 07:08:00 -0800 (PST) From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com To: david.portz@enron.com Subject: Distibution of EEI draft Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Elizabeth Sager X-To: David Portz X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Elizabeth_Sager_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: Sager-E X-FileName: esager.nsf Into product should be distributed to Andy and Patricia Young. Emails in this email ---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/09/99 03:07 PM --------------------------- "Andy Katz" on 12/08/99 04:16:29 PM To: HEMU@dynegy.com, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, rosteen@powersrc.com, pdondanville@schiffhardin.com cc: Subject: Re: Draft Agenda for 12/15/99 EEI/NEMA Contract Group Meeting I've been hiding in the weeds. Hisss. I agree w/ Patty and Liz that product definition should be the primary focus of the meeting. It would seem most of the transmission related issues PECO (or Dynegy) have could be addressed in the context of the force majeure definition and how specific product definitions tighten or loosen FM excuses for non-performance. I think we can represent that discussions w/ FERC staff will take place during January. Our meeting coordinator is talking w/ Mariott about roll out meetings in Houston during the first week of March and in NYC late April/early May. Let me know if you have any scheduling conflicts during those timeframes and I'll circulate some proposed dates w/ the product definitions. Also, let me know if you are not interested in participating in one of or both roll-outs. I will gladly circulate product definitions, but will be out of town after the 10th. Could you CC: Patricia Young at EEI 202/508-5757 pyoung@eei.org with any definitions you want circulated. Another topic I would suggest discussing briefly if time is available is the results of the contract survey. We have received many responses. Tabulation of the results should be done by our meeting. Andrew S. Katz, Senior Attorney Edison Electric Institute 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Voice: 202-508-5616 Fax: 202-508-5673 e-mail: akatz@eei.org >>> 12/07/99 07:40PM >>> Please take a look at this and give me your thoughts. One area that I believe needs more work in particular is the item referring to FERC policies; I think this is PECO's issue, but I'm not sure what FERC policies they are concerned about. I would like to attach the current definitions of the products to the agenda. Do we have a definition of the "Into __" product that has been updated since the November 9 conference call? Is there a new defintion of the "Firm (LD-System Reliability)" product? What about trying to tackle bookouts if we have the time? Is there any conceivable way we will have the time? Thanks, Harlan (See attached file: EEI-NEMA AGENDA.DOC)