Message-ID: <7901908.1075859126667.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:15:08 -0800 (PST) From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com To: f..calger@enron.com Subject: RE: WSPP vs EEI Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Sager, Elizabeth X-To: Calger, Christopher F. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Elizabeth_Sager_Jan2002\Sager, Elizabeth\Sent Items X-Origin: Sager-E X-FileName: esager (Non-Privileged).pst I agree that Netco will also need to use WSPP and we should anticipate responding accordingly. For general conversation, though I still think we should recommend EEI. As we open up for contracting, I think Christian, Steve and I will be able to quickly identify those Caps who will only use WASP. Elizabeth Sager 713-853-6349 -----Original Message----- From: Calger, Christopher F. Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:27 PM To: Sager, Elizabeth Subject: WSPP vs EEI The dealers and some of the customers are ok with an EEI but some important counterparties are anti-EEI. BPA comes to mind. Digging in our heels on an EEI-only position might make it difficult to get up and running. Do you have a view of this? Chris Calger 503-464-3735