Message-ID: <3504370.1075841542951.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:13:00 -0700 (PDT) From: holden.salisbury@enron.com To: jeremy.morris@enron.com Subject: PV CUT LLH for 04/16 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Holden Salisbury X-To: Jeremy Morris X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Salisbury, Holden\Sent Items X-Origin: SALISBURY-H X-FileName: holden salisbury 6-26-02.PST ---------------------- Forwarded by Holden Salisbury/PDX/ECT on 04/17/2001 10:21 AM --------------------------- Cara Semperger 04/16/2001 03:12 PM To: Holden Salisbury/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: PV CUT LLH for 04/16 Steve at Pac says he spoke with Jeremy about the cut on Sunday. ---------------------- Forwarded by Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT on 04/16/2001 03:20 PM --------------------------- Monika Causholli 04/16/2001 04:49 AM To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Stacy Runswick/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: PV CUT LLH for 04/16 We had a very strange cut today starting HE 1-6. Tag # 016370L where the gen is EPE- E-CISO-PACE happened to be a cancelled tag and none of the counterparties including us did not know anything. After spending hours on the phone with CISO and PAC John @ PACE found that this tag had been replaced by tag 16381N but none knew anything about it. This tag was for 78 MW and it was done by a PACE prescheduler. We were trying to find a new sink in the meantime so before this new tag was found the following went RT HE 01 78 MW to APS (APS took the power) HE 02 sank with LADWP @ $0. I agreed with John at PACE that we are going to charge PAC for HE 1-2 LDs Then for HE 3-6 the power was sent to PACE for the original deal price at PV. John at PACE was going to leave good notes to his prescheduler about this cut. I did not do anything HA to manage the cut (in enpower, Lotus notes ) as JOhn at PACE did not consider this a HA cut but a DA cut that nobody knew about. We left it up to the preschedulers to agree on this cut. if you have questions ask me, Monika