Message-ID: <32441129.1075853242990.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com
To: andrew.edison@enron.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com
Subject: Fw: Memo to Barrett on Spoliation of Evidence
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Barrett H. Reasoner" <Breasoner@Gibbs-Bruns.com>
X-To: "'andrew.edison@enron.com'" <andrew.edison@enron.com>, "'richard.b.sanders@enron.com'" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION AND ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT- Richard and Andy -Here are some points put together by my
associate. The research is by no means exhaustive.Please call me when you've
had a chance to review. Thanks - Barrett

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark A. Giugliano <mgiugliano@Gibbs-Bruns.com>
To: Barrett H. Reasoner <Breasoner@Gibbs-Bruns.com>
Sent: Wed May 30 19:03:13 2001
Subject: Memo to Barrett on Spoliation of Evidence

Attached is the memo.  Call me at home if you need any more assistance with
this tonight.  (713) 436-2716.






 - Memo to Barrett on Spoliation of Evidence_v1.WPD