Subject: Vote on arbitration demand
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:31:39 -0700 (PDT)

Evidently I misunderstood my marching orders.  Richard Sanders just called to advise me that any vote on an arbitration demand was within his bailiwick and that he was adamantly opposed to the committee making a demand or commencing any other action against SCE at this time.  I apologize for my misunderstanding and wanted to correct the record immediately.  Needless to say, Enron at this time also opposes expenditure of time by committee counsel to prepare papers in connection with any arbitration demand.

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me by return mail, e-mail or at (insert your telephone number).  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
J. Robert Nelson
725 Soth Figueroa St, Los Angeles, Ca. 90017-5436

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================