Message-ID: <4721963.1075858669070.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:06:11 -0700 (PDT) From: mmolland@brobeck.com To: c..williams@enron.com, b..sanders@enron.com Subject: FW: Review and identification of documents in California and Hou ston responsive the AG subpoena to EES Cc: arguedas@caclaw.net, aruby@rubyschofield.com, meltzerlaw@aol.com, smith@enron.com, adsmith@brobeck.com, meringolo@enron.com, pmeringolo@brobeck.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: arguedas@caclaw.net, aruby@rubyschofield.com, meltzerlaw@aol.com, smith@enron.com, adsmith@brobeck.com, meringolo@enron.com, pmeringolo@brobeck.com X-From: "Molland, Michael E." @ENRON X-To: Williams, Robert C. , 'sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com', 'mlk@pkns.com', 'mtuohey@velaw.com', Fergus, Gary S. , Sanders, Richard B. X-cc: 'arguedas@caclaw.net', 'aruby@rubyschofield.com', 'meltzerlaw@aol.com', Smith, Amanda D. , Meringolo, Peter X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sanders, Richard B (Non-Privileged)\Sanders, Richard B.\Senator Dunn Inv. X-Origin: Sanders-R X-FileName: Sanders, Richard B (Non-Privileged).pst This reports on our efforts to identify documents responsive to the AG's subpoena to EES in California and Houston. California: Most hard copy documents have been retrieved from the Costa Mesa office. Two lawyers will be at the San Ramon office this week to complete the hard copy review there. They will complete the hard copy review in Costa Mesa next week. We propose a limited review of the e-mail for four or five EES officers during the following week. We will need clearance from Bob to allow us to do so effectively. I understand that EES is now giving notice to customers that their contracts may be produced. This notice should be completed soon so we can produce documents at or near the end of July. The following report, in Word format, from Peter Meringolo and Amanda Smith, explains our proposed plan for the review and production of California documents in detail. Please let us know if we should modify it. <<3@JLQ01!.DOC>> Houston: Last week I interviewed EES employees in Houston about potentially responsive documents. My report on these interviews was sent to you yesterday. While we will maintain our territoriality objections to the subpoena, we should identify soon the documents in Houston which respond to the following numbered categories of requests: Nos. 2 and 3: All contracts under which EES has purchased electricity on the Western interconnection between 1998 and the end of 2003 No. 6. Documents relating to the assessment of risks regarding: the cost of purchasing electricity in California No. 7. Documents relating to strategies or business plans designed to minimize risks with regard to the cost of purchasing electricity necessary to serve customers No. 8. Documents relating to decisions to return direct access customers to default utility distributors in California, including documents relating to cost savings No. 9. Communications relating to the return of direct access customers in California ======================================================= This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP http://www.brobeck.com - 3@JLQ01!.DOC