Message-ID: <3339792.1075853253121.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 04:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: radack@dca.co.harris.tx.us
Subject: RE: Linda Guinn
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richard B Sanders
X-To: "Radack, Judge Sherry (DCA)" <Radack@DCA.CO.HARRIS.TX.US>@ENRON
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

Squires is not going to recuse himself. However,he was not the judge who 
heard the prel. hearing. An associate judge--Brent Burg-- heard the prelim. 
hearing



	"Radack, Judge Sherry (DCA)" <Radack@DCA.CO.HARRIS.TX.US>
	05/22/2000 10:34 AM
		 
		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: 
		 Subject: RE: Linda Guinn


didn't you say squires was going to recuse.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com [mailto:Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 10:06 AM
To: Radack@DCA.CO.HARRIS.TX.US
Subject: RE: Linda Guinn



I dont understand your message.Squires is the Judge. Susan Myres is the
opposing counsel




                    "Radack, Judge

                    Sherry (DCA)"             To:
"'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
                    <Radack@DCA.CO.HAR        cc:

                    RIS.TX.US>                Subject:     RE: Linda Guinn



                    05/22/2000 07:39

                    AM









before I go asking around, it would be helpful to know what judge it is.

squires is wonderful.  judge probably sustained b/c objections were good.
he would be my first choice.

tell me asap who is the judge.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com [mailto:Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2000 12:10 PM
To: Radack@DCA.CO.HARRIS.TX.US
Subject: RE:Linda Guinn



As we discussed, Linda's divorce is in Judge Squires' court. The opposing
counsel is Susan Myres, who I think has recently moved to Don
Fullenwiller's firm. She presents a problem for two reasons. First,she is
much,much more aggressive than Linda's current atty. At the prelimanary
hearing, she objected to half of the question, which the judge sustained(he
has asked to withdraw and I say good riddance)  The bigger problem in my
mind is that her aggression has "empowered" Linda's husband. It is pretty
pathetic from what Linda tells me. He says things like"wait till I tell my
lawyer about this, she'll go straight to the judge" Linda needs someone
that knows what they are doing, is aggressive enough to handle Ms.Myres,
and has some clout with the Judge. Linda can pay,but has limited resources.
Thanks for your help.