Subject: FW: Tentative Ruling on AG action
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 05:48:40 -0700 (PDT)

-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Molland, Michael E." <[email-masked]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Molland[email-masked]] 
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 7:47 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'
Cc:	[email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; Fergus, Gary S.; Williams, Robert C.; Brody, Janet J.
Subject:	FW: Tentative Ruling on AG action

> 	Here is a transcription of the tentative ruling:
>
> Granted subject to protective order that the specific documents
> established to be confidential or otherwise subject to protection not be
> disclosed outside the offices of the California Attorney General or the
> Attorneys General of other states that agree to no further disclosure
> without prior court order.
>
We did not learn of this tentative until after 4:30 today, although it was
probably posted sometime earlier in the afternoon.  The local rule states
that a party who wishes to argue the tentative shall notify opposing counsel
before 4:30. We called their attorneys after 4:30, but before 5 PM. I
reached Martin Goyette, counsel for the AG personally by phone shortly after
five, and notified him of our intention to argue. He claimed the AG would
not appear to argue given late notice. I have notified him by fax of our
intention to argue.

>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to [email-masked]
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com