Message-ID: <10915261.1075858543969.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:29:00 -0700 (PDT) From: diana.scholtes@enron.com To: alan.comnes@enron.com Subject: RE: REVISION 200 TRANSMISSION USAGE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Scholtes, Diana X-To: Comnes, Alan X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Scholtes, Diana (Non-Privileged)\Diana Scholtes\Saved Sent X-Origin: Scholtes-D X-FileName: Scholtes, Diana (Non-Privileged).pst I didn't separate the PGE data, only BPA by your request. If you need me to do so please let me know. ds -----Original Message----- From: Comnes, Alan Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:03 PM To: Scholtes, Diana Subject: RE: REVISION 200 TRANSMISSION USAGE Diana: Looks great. I have a follow up questions: It looks like you parsed PGE data into the 4 buckets (Network-ST , Network LT, IT ST, IT LT). Is that true (i.e. 100% of our PGE usage is IT LT) or would disaggregating our usage on PGE require more work? Thanks, Alan -----Original Message----- From: Scholtes, Diana Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:50 AM To: Comnes, Alan Cc: Belden, Tim Subject: REVISION 200 TRANSMISSION USAGE Please let me know if you need additional information. ds << File: trani_1999_2000.xls >>