Message-ID: <5604828.1075840025274.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 12:58:48 -0800 (PST) From: diana.scholtes@enron.com To: amy.clemons@enron.com Subject: RE: City of Shasta Lake Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Scholtes, Diana X-To: Clemons, Amy X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Scholtes, Diana\Sent Items X-Origin: SCHOLTES-D X-FileName: Amy, I have forward this to Sean Crandall to help you settle. I will be out of the office for the balance of the year. Thanks, Diana Scholtes -----Original Message----- From: Clemons, Amy Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:31 PM To: Scholtes, Diana; Rosman, Stewart Cc: Purcell, Mike Subject: City of Shasta Lake Diana & Stewart I am hoping one of you can help me. I am trying to send aninvoice out to City of Shasta Lake, but there is a deal we don't show in view actuals,or CARP, etc. so it's not part of the numbers I have to invoice then on - but they say they owe it to us. It is the transmission capacity deal #839722.1 for City of Shasta Lake. They see they owe us for this deal in the amount of $36,600. Stewart, I had faxed you the confirm on #659898.1. It was a Laird Dyer deal and you were going to see if you could find out how we would settle it. I am not sure if the two deals are related, but maybe they are? Could the two of you look into these and let me know. I need to invoice them with deal #839722.1, and I also need to know if we need to do anything for deal #659898.1. Let me know. Thanks - Amy