Message-ID: <33301989.1075840028767.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:59:07 -0700 (PDT) From: chris.m.turner@mirant.com To: isas@wscc.com Subject: RE: Scheduling Time constant Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Turner, Christopher M. (Mirant-West) X-To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS) X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Scholtes, Diana\STF\Current issues X-Origin: SCHOLTES-D X-FileName: Mirant would like to see PPT as the permanent scheduling time for the same reasons stated by WMIC. The two hours a year impacted by the time change are more than outweighed by the other 8,758 hours in the year. Christopher M. Turner Mirant America's Energy Marketing 678-579-3444 -----Original Message----- From: Droll, Jodi [mailto:Jodi.Droll@XCELENERGY.COM] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:40 AM To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS) Subject: RE: Scheduling Time constant I (PSCO TP & CA) agree with Don. I thought we were trying to get away from time changes ! > -----Original Message----- > From: Lacen, Don [SMTP:DLACEN@pnm.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 7:01 AM > To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS) > Subject: RE: Scheduling Time constant > > Since PPT changes twice a year and it does not resolve this scheduling > problem, where PST would! I recommend (PNM-CA/TP) we drop this issue > until we can agree on a constant time zone standard (which we will never > agree on). > > Don Lacen > Public Service Company of New Mexico > Transmission Services Coordinator > Alvarado Square, MS EP11 > Albuquerque, NM, 87158 > 505-241-2032 > dlacen@pnm.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Franz, Marilyn [ ] > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:43 PM > To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS) > Subject: RE: Scheduling Time constant > > > SPPC Transmission would like to go forward with PPT as a common scheduling > > time for the same reasons the expressed by WMIC. > > Also, attached are the minutes for the Vancouver meeting. > > Thanks, > Marilyn Franz > Sierra Pacific Power Transmission > 775-834-4322 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hackney, Mark W(Z39911) [ ] > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:01 AM > To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS) > Subject: Scheduling Time constant > > > It's been brought to my attention that we never resolved the issue of the > common scheduling time (no Freudian slip on the acronym). The group > agreed > to a PST value in July, but we wanted to survey the OC and WMIC first > before > going further. That was to be one of our topic in Vancouver. Well.... > > So, I'd like to get a feel from the group: the survey leaned toward > Pacific > Prevailing Time as that match up with energy products, so.. continue to go > > forward with PST as in July, modify our suggestion to PPT or drop all > together and wait to see if NERC is going to come up with something. If > we > decide to go with either PST or PPT, I will get the OC Steering to help > with > clarification on this as a due process item or an item that can be brought > > to the OC for vote in 2002. In addition, I would think that most would > agree that implementation if it takes affect would be favorable at the > April > 2002 time change, so that is my suggestion that we use, if ISAS goes > forward > with the request to the OC. > > Please get back with your thought by next Wednesday so I can put together > something for the upcoming OC meetings. > > Mark W. Hackney > Section Leader > Pre and Real-time Transmission Scheduling > APS OATT Administration > Arizona Public Service Company > 602.250.1128 - Office > 602.908.1423 - Cell > 602.250.1155 - Fax > > _________________________________________________________________ > Click to add my contact info to your organizer: > >