Message-ID: <14345843.1075860749905.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:06:17 -0800 (PST) From: gaynel.henley@enron.com To: darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com Subject: Citizens Griffith Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: Henley, Gaynel X-To: Schoolcraft, Darrell X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darrell_Schoolcraft_Mar2002\Schoolcraft, Darrell\Inbox\Citizens Griffith X-Origin: Schoolcraft-D X-FileName: dschool (Non-Privileged).pst Received a call from Tom Tucker approximately 1600 wanting to switch the fl= ow from TW to El Paso for testing purposes. Tom explained that it was warr= anty work and the flow would only be switched for about 5-15 minutes. I agr= eed to allow him to switch the flow. He agreed when he was finished testin= g that everything would be put back to the original set points and he would= call GC when finished with the test. Tom called GC shortly after the flow= was put back to TW feed to Griffith. He explained that it did not take lo= ng and everything was finished to his satisfaction. Shortly afterwards at = approximately 1725, I noticed that the TW feed to Griffith was falling in r= ate and El Paso went to 165 flow rate. I resent the set point for TW flow = to Griffith. I called the Griffith plant and spoke to Dave (operator at th= e plant), who was unaware that Tom was in the yard, to check on the plant p= ressures and flow. Dave had not seen any problems with pressures or flow. = I also called Tom's cell phone - reached him the second time. He was stil= l at the site and told me that he had by-passed our meter to Griffith. He = also told me that the reading from El Paso was false and apologized for not= calling to let me know that he was performing additional work. I asked hi= m to call once again before leaving the site. =20