Message-ID: <8640660.1075860744769.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:16:24 -0800 (PST)
From: darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com
To: david.roensch@enron.com
Subject: FW: preliminary report
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Schoolcraft, Darrell </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DSCHOOL>
X-To: Roensch, David </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=68f10420-593507c0-86256744-5ee2d3>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Darrell_Schoolcraft_Mar2002\Schoolcraft, Darrell\Sent Items
X-Origin: Schoolcraft-D
X-FileName: dschool (Non-Privileged).pst



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Franson, Rob" <RFranson@czn.com>@ENRON  
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	FW: preliminary report


Attached is a copy of the preliminary report that  recommends that the inlet pressure to Citizens "Griffith Plant" Station be  limited to 740 psig.  Note that this is only a preliminary report that  Citizens is reviewing.  Some of our "reviewers" are on vacation, and have  held up the process of getting this report finalized.
 
Since  I was temporarily assigned to another position during the time that gas was  introduced to this line, I have asked my employee Martin Conboy to create a log  of events on how these stations had been operated.  I will send it to you  later today.  
 
Can  you have David Roensch review to see if anything is missing.  I feel that  it is a good idea to document the different operation modes with results prior  to agreeing on any further changes.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Kelm - Kelm Engineering  [mailto:ray@kelm-engr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:22  PM
To: Robert Franson - Citizens
Subject: preliminary  report
Robert,
 
I had to delete a couple figures to get the size  below 1 meg to email.
 
Call if you have questions.
 
Ray
 - CZN102301mod.doc