Message-ID: <5927522.1075860747640.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:58:02 -0800 (PST) From: darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com To: donna.scott@enron.com Subject: RE: Commission Meeting Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Schoolcraft, Darrell X-To: Scott, Donna X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darrell_Schoolcraft_Mar2002\Schoolcraft, Darrell\Sent Items X-Origin: Schoolcraft-D X-FileName: dschool (Non-Privileged).pst Thanks ds -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Donna Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:56 AM To: Buchanan, John; Schoolcraft, Darrell Subject: Commission Meeting I thought you might find this interesting. Next, was a presentation by Staff on the California Update. Staff gave some interesting statistics: consumption grew 16% in 1995-2000 while capacity increased by 3%. In-state capacity will be insufficient to meet peak demand. Within the 2001-2006 new generation of 3200 MW will come on line in 2001; 6500 MW will be under construction and 15,000 MW has been either tabled or cancelled. Hydropower accounts for 20-40% and will play a significant role in the next five years. This places California at the mercy of snow pack conditions for up to 40% of its requirements. Last year the snow pack was 64% of typical and this year it is at 130%. Natural gas accounts for 15% of the state's needs; therefore, 85% is imported from outside the state. (47% from Southwest; 28% Canada and 10% from the Rocky Mountain pipes).Gas fired generation will decline in the next five years according to staff for three reasons: new generation facilities coming on line hydro will be at normal or above levels neighboring states will sell into California If there are surprises such as short-term price volatility, economic growth outpaces projects, low hydro conditions, energy conservation declines, California will experience similar conditions to last year.