Message-ID: <9281089.1075846737183.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 10:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: david.foti@enron.com
Subject: WT-1 Electric Service Agreement
Cc: rich.jolly@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: rich.jolly@enron.com
X-From: Susan Scott
X-To: David Foti
X-cc: Rich Jolly
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: SCOTT-S
X-FileName: sscott3.nsf

P.S. -- Dave, on your wish list you had included an evergreen provision.  See 
Section 2 of the original contract, which gives TW the right to extend for 
another five-year term by giving notice to SPS.  If TW does not give such 
notice, SPS may cancel the contract, and if it doesn't, the contract 
automatically rolls over for another year.  If this is not acceptable please 
let me know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 05/10/2000 
05:40 PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Susan Scott                           05/10/2000 05:41 PM
	

To: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: WT-1 Electric Service Agreement

Rich and Dave, attached are my suggested revisions to Mike McLeod's draft of 
an amendment to the original electric service agreement.  Dave, I'll bring 
you a copy of that agreement.  Rich, if Mike did not send you one, let me 
know and I will fax it to you.  

In my revisions, I've attempted to reflect the least cost billing you 
described to me, using terminology I read in the tariff.  Please let me know 
if it looks alright to you.  I'm available to discuss this whenever you are, 
then I will make sending this to Mike top priority.  My sincerest apologies 
for the delay; there has been more chaos around here than I am accustomed to 
handling, and I appreciate your patience.

Susan
x30596