Message-ID: <11464571.1075846738826.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 01:10:00 -0800 (PST) From: susan.scott@enron.com To: lindy.donoho@enron.com, jeffery.fawcett@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, christine.stokes@enron.com, kevin.hyatt@enron.com Subject: Final Draft: GPG Order 637 Rehearing Comments Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Susan Scott X-To: Lindy Donoho, Jeffery Fawcett, Lorraine Lindberg, Christine Stokes, Kevin Hyatt X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\'sent mail X-Origin: SCOTT-S X-FileName: sscott3.nsf See especially pages 5 & 6 of the attached doc., which include the argument that existing ROFR should not be grandfathered. Please send any comments you have to me. Thanks!! ---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 03/10/2000 09:09 AM --------------------------- Shelley Corman 03/09/2000 06:20 PM To: Caroline Barnes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jack Boatman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Janet Butler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Alma Carrillo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Cones/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Farrell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou Geiler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bob M Hall/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bambi Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Theresa Hess/ET&S/Enron, Staci Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Anne Jolibois/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Lehn/FGT/Enron@Enron, Teb Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Zelda Paschal/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Phillips/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pilar Ramirez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Rub/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Patti Rumler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Emily Sellers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dee Svatos/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Gina Taylor/HOU/EES@EES, Stephen Veatch/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Linda Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Final Draft: GPG Order 637 Rehearing Comments Thank you for all the comments. Here is a last draft of our GPG rehearing comments. Please forward any additional comments no later than noon, Friday March 10. Significant changes from the last draft are as follows: 1. We are asking the Commission to eliminate the peak/off-peak cost & revenue study, rather than clarify that the study applies only to excess revenues. (p.2) 2. References to the TW Global Settlement have been removed. The reference to existing settlements is more generic and included only to preserve our rights. (p.4) 3. A new argument on ROFR has been added. We are asking the Commission to immediately apply the new policy that ROFR does not apply to discount rate agreements. (p.5-6) 4.Several reporting arguments have been deleted -- masking shipper names, clarifying that only senior employee names have to be posted and clarifying the Sept. 1 reporting date. With respect to these last two arguments, we have decided that we can interpret it our way without further clarification. 5.New clarification concerning the date for which the lifting of the price caps on capacity release is to be implemented.