Message-ID: <28922079.1075846662595.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: bcherry@sempra.com
To: susan.scott@enron.com
Subject: RE: GIR Rebuttal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Cherry, Brian - TPBKC" <BCherry@sempra.com>
X-To: "'Susan.Scott@enron.com'" <Susan.Scott@enron.com>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: SCOTT-S
X-FileName: sscott3.nsf

You may want to consider rebuttal testimony on the Kern River testimony, that 
argues that new pipelines and new pipeline interconnects should not be 
secondary to existing pipelines.? PG&E also filed testimony on WR that you 
might be concerned with.