Message-ID: <30457645.1075846667013.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 05:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: steven.harris@enron.com, jeffery.fawcett@enron.com, kevin.hyatt@enron.com, 
	lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, tk.lohman@enron.com, 
	michele.lokay@enron.com, christine.stokes@enron.com, 
	bill.cordes@enron.com, mary.miller@enron.com, julia.white@enron.com, 
	shelley.corman@enron.com, sstojic@gbmdc.com
Subject: Capacity Options on TW
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Susan Scott
X-To: Steven Harris, Jeffery Fawcett, Kevin Hyatt, Lorraine Lindberg, TK Lohman, Michele Lokay, Christine Stokes, Bill Cordes, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller, Julia White, Shelley Corman, sstojic@gbmdc.com
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: SCOTT-S
X-FileName: sscott3.nsf

Attached is a preliminary draft of a filing for capacity options on 
Transwestern.  The attachments include a filing letter, proposed tariff 
language and a proposed form agreement.

Obviously there are still quite a few details to be worked out.  I am 
distributing a draft at this early stage in hopes of initiating a dialogue 
about the larger issues first.  A few that come to mind are whether we want 
to commit to selling options online, how best to explain or justify the 
option fee, and what specifically in the industry has changed such that FERC 
should depart from existing policy and allow TW to essentially reserve future 
capacity for shippers.  Please let me know your thoughts on these and any 
other issues.  

I would prefer to wait to discuss comments on wording, other conforming 
changes to the tariff, and other comments concerning form until after we have 
resolved the substantive issues.  Thanks.