Message-ID: <805878.1075846667085.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 06:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mbaldwin@igservice.com
To: sscott3@enron.com, jfawcet@enron.com
Subject: Socal Exhibit 28
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "mbaldwin" <mbaldwin@igservice.com>
X-To: "Susan Scott" <sscott3@enron.com>, "Jeff Fawcett" <jfawcet@enron.com>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: SCOTT-S
X-FileName: sscott3.nsf

Just reviewed Socal's Exhibit 28. Well, life seems to be one big comprise. I
guess its more important that Norm's group doesn't object than we get this
right. Maybe so. I think the only appropriate response, if any, would be to
tell the judge that additional factors like K/M upstream delivery
commitments have not been addressed when stating the delivery capacity
available to Socal etc. We should probably save our ultimate response to the
comment period after we see how Norm and others intend to manipulate the
information provided in the Exhibit. Call me, I would like to hear your
thoughts.

Mark, IGS