Message-ID: <805878.1075846667085.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 06:07:00 -0700 (PDT) From: mbaldwin@igservice.com To: sscott3@enron.com, jfawcet@enron.com Subject: Socal Exhibit 28 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: "mbaldwin" X-To: "Susan Scott" , "Jeff Fawcett" X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: SCOTT-S X-FileName: sscott3.nsf Just reviewed Socal's Exhibit 28. Well, life seems to be one big comprise. I guess its more important that Norm's group doesn't object than we get this right. Maybe so. I think the only appropriate response, if any, would be to tell the judge that additional factors like K/M upstream delivery commitments have not been addressed when stating the delivery capacity available to Socal etc. We should probably save our ultimate response to the comment period after we see how Norm and others intend to manipulate the information provided in the Exhibit. Call me, I would like to hear your thoughts. Mark, IGS