Message-ID: <5085888.1075846658044.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 05:57:00 -0800 (PST)
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: lindy.donoho@enron.com
Subject: Re: EFBH Service approved
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Susan Scott
X-To: Lindy Donoho
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: SCOTT-S
X-FileName: sscott3.nsf

Lindy -- I'm working on a checklist.
There were just a couple of issues arising from the discussions with market 
services, weren't there?
One having to do with whether we want to change our 68 A to reflect FTS-1 and 
FTS-3 in same bucket -- I'm leaning towards not changing since the language 
is already general enough to cover us there.
The other issue had to do with issuing the OFO if EFBH does not show up in 
the last cycle.  I do not believe any changes are necessary there either.  
The tariff language as it's currently written says we "shall" issue an OFO, 
and we would, but an OFO issued in the last cycle would simply be a formality 
and the EFBH shipper would have no choice but to pay the penalty.
If you see any roadblocks on these 2 tariff sheets (27A and 68A), or if there 
are any other issues we need to address, let me know.  Also, if you want to 
sit down and go thru my checklist together sometime tomorrow, or even later 
this afternoon, I'm available.
Thanks!
S.




Lindy Donoho
02/01/2000 10:40 AM
To: Ramona Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn 
Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth 
Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Rivers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven 
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK 
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: EFBH Service approved  

The effective date will be 2/23/2000.  Marketing does not anticipate offering 
the service until March 1, 2000.

Susan is working on the compliance tariff sheets right now to be filed 15 
days after the Order is issued (the Draft Order was issued last Thursday, so 
the final Order should be issued within a couple days after that).  The 
change I think you're referring to is the way we had anticipated prorating 
FTS-1 & FTS-3 together when FBH is showing-up and now, we actually will match 
FTS-3 with the FBH space and FTS-1 will be allocated "existing" space as 
usual.  Susan is looking at the tariff language now and is thinking a 
language change may not be necessary.  She will be discussing with Mary Kay.  
Regardless of which decision, it's being addressed.

Were there any other tariff language changes? (I know FTS-3 should be added 
to 22.2, D, 1.  Susan and Mary Darveaux are reviewing all the GT&C's to check 
for where FTS-3 &/or FBH should be referenced, etc.)

Please let me know.  Thanks!
Lindy



Ramona Betancourt
02/01/2000 09:47 AM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell 
Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia 
Rivers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia 
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: EFBH Service approved  

Lindy,  
Does this mean that the effective date will still be 2/23/2000?

Also did all of our changes that we discussed in our system requirement 
meetings get included in the revised tariff sheets?

What date will marketing start offering the service? I know we are still 
pushing to have the nominations, contracts, scheduling & confirmation system 
changes ready for 3/1/2000  production migration move.

Thanks Ramona