Message-ID: <17244313.1075846674458.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 03:49:00 -0800 (PST)
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: ted.chavez@enron.com
Subject: Re: Guaranty for Sprague Energy
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Susan Scott
X-To: Ted Chavez
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: SCOTT-S
X-FileName: sscott3.nsf

Ted, here are a few suggested changes.
Also, regarding the language you crossed out at the bottom of paragraph 1 
(about notice of default, payment within 15 days, etc.), I do not think that 
language was objectionable from a legal standpoint, and might actually be 
helpful as far as giving them a payment deadline.  However, if it's 
inconsistent with your procedures, or you just don't like having to give them 
notice, I see no problem at all with crossing it out.







Ted Chavez
11/02/2000 11:42 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Guaranty for Sprague Energy

Susan,

 Please review the attached guaranty for Sprague Energy.  I have made some 
changes, but need your approval.

 Please advise if you need anything.

Thanks,
Ted
X-37952