Message-ID: <33436159.1075846686053.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 05:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: keith.petersen@enron.com
Subject: certificate questions
Cc: michele.winckowski@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: michele.winckowski@enron.com
X-From: Susan Scott
X-To: Keith Petersen
X-cc: Michele Winckowski
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: SCOTT-S
X-FileName: sscott3.nsf

Keith, last week you and I discussed briefly Facilities Planning's proposal 
to change the service factor on the Gallup compressor in order to increase 
capacity.  I believe you had concluded that a certificate application would 
be necessary.  Now Arnold Eisenstein is asking me (thru our commercial 
people) whether we would still have to make a filing if our certificated 
capacity could be increased without any physical modification to the 
compressor -- in other words, through a pressure commitment.  My initial 
impression is yes, we would have to make a filing.  Am I out of my mind?  
Does this make sense?  Please advise.