Message-ID: <5607335.1075846691340.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:37:00 -0700 (PDT) From: bcherry@sempra.com To: susan.scott@enron.com, bcherry@sempra.com Subject: RE: I.99-07-003 - EPNG Revisions To SoCalGas Draft Exh 28 re Pipe line Capacity Cc: gsullivan@sempra.com, jeffery.fawcett@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: gsullivan@sempra.com, jeffery.fawcett@enron.com X-From: "Cherry, Brian - TPBKC" X-To: "'Susan.Scott@enron.com'" , "Cherry, Brian - TPBKC" X-cc: "Sullivan, Glen J." , Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com X-bcc: X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: SCOTT-S X-FileName: sscott3.nsf Susan - We expect to get a further revision out later today as a preview to the final filing.? I think that should resolve TW's concerns.? However, feel free to call and yell at me nonetheless....... -----Original Message----- From: Susan.Scott@enron.com [mailto:Susan.Scott@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 10:32 AM To: BCherry@sempra.com Cc: GSullivan@sempra.com; Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com Subject: I.99-07-003 - EPNG Revisions To SoCalGas Draft Exh 28 re Pipeline Capacity Brian -- TW does not agree with the changes proposed by El Paso.? If we need to discuss this further please e-mail or call. Thanks. Susan Scott Transwestern Pipeline Company 713-853-0596 ---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 06/20/2000 12:28 PM --------------------------- "Edward W. O'Neill" on 06/19/2000 09:13:34 PM To:?? sscott3@enron.com, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#abag.ca.gov#c#davef@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#abag.ca.gov#c#garyb@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#adamsbroadwell.com#c#mdjoseph@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#adplaw.com#c#epoole@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#aelaw.com#c#eke@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#aglet.org#c#jweil@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#aol.com#c#pjpowerlaw@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#aol.com#c#rczahar@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#aol.com#c#ronknecht@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#bcjlaw.com#c#johnj@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#calpine.com#c#craigc@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us#c#grant#u#kolling@J MBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us#c#raveen#u#maan@JMB M.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cfbf.com#c#kmills@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#ci.burbank.ca.us#c#bjeider@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#ci.glendale.ca.us#c#slins@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#ci.pasadena.ca.us#c#eklinkner@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#clfp.com#c#ed@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#alb@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#bho@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#edf@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#eyq@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#jwr@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#ltt@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#mcn@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#plg@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#ram@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#raw@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#rmp@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#sbs@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#tah@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cpuc.ca.gov#c#vjb@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cts.com#c#burkee@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#cubjpa.org#c#rochmanm@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#dbsr.com#c#dcarroll@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#dwt.com#c#lindseyhowdowning@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#dwt.com#c#salleyoo@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#dynegy.com#c#gtbl@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#dynegy.com#c#jmpa@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#earthlink.net#c#ceyap@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#efawest.navfac.navy.mil#c#furutanj@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#energy-law-group.com#c#askaff@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#energy.state.ca.us#c#bwood@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#energy.state.ca.us#c#gbudin@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#energy.state.ca.us#c#mjaske@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#energy.state.ca.us#c#stomashe@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#energy.twc.com#c#rpelote@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#eslawfirm.com#c#lmh@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#et.pge.com#c#tom#c#roth@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#gmssr.com#c#bcragg@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#gmssr.com#c#jmct@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#gmssr.com#c#mday@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#greenmountain.com#c#rick#c#counihan@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#iepa.com#c#iep@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#iid.com#c#jsteffen@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#ix.netcom.com#c#igsinc@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#jmbm.com#c#ewo@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#jonesday.com#c#napedersen@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#klindh.com#c#karen@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#ladwp.com#c#rpetti@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#lif.org#c#joseh@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#llgm.com#c#chilen@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#luce.com#c#jleslie@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#mrwassoc.com#c#rbw@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#newsdata.com#c#aod@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#orrick.com#c#rgloistein@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#pcenergy.com#c#jcattermole@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#pcp.ca#c#alan#u#reid@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#pge.com#c#evk1@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#reliantenergy.com#c#ghinners@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#rmiinc.com#c#ron#u#oechsler@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#sablaw.com#c#kmccrea@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#sce.com#c#inggm@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#seiworldwide.com#c#kfyip@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#sempra.com#c#gsullivan@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#sempratrading.com#c#skatz@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#sf.whitecase.com#c#karpjos@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#spurr.org#c#rochmanm@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#swgas.com#c#andy#c#bettwy@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#turn.org#c#marcel@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#utility.com#c#chris#c#king@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#westerngas.com#c#tdickers@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#wgp.twc.com#c#mark.c#c#moench@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#whitecase.com#c#jkarp@JMBM.COM cc:?? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#epenergy.com#c#fergusonm@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#epenergy.com#c#healyb@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#epenergy.com#c#mcconnk@JMBM.COM, ????? SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#internet#c#epenergy.com#c#weaverj@JMBM.COM Subject:? I.99-07-003 - EPNG Revisions To SoCalGas Draft Exh 28 re Pipeline ????? Capacity Attached is an e-mail containing revisions and additions El Paso recommends be made to SoCalGas' draft Exhibit 28 which was distributed for further comment to parties on June 16, 2000.? This e-mail has two attachments.? The first attachment is a revised copy of SoCalGas' table titled "Firm Pipeline Capacity into Southern California" with changes to:? (a) correct the amount of firm interstate capacity on El Paso at Topock, shown in the col. "Incoming Interstate Capacity," by replacing the incorrect figure, 2230 MMcfd (which includes capacity for delivery to SW Gas which is not available to California on a firm basis) with the correct figure,? 2080 MMcfd; (b) delete the reference to El Paso delivery capacity to SW Gas from the col. "Total Take-away Capacity" since this capacity is not firm capacity available to California; (c) adjust the totals at the bottom of both cols. affected by these changes; (d) add a new footnote to reference to the fact that shippers on El Paso have existing firm contract rights for delivery from El Paso at Topock to SoCalGas totaling 1466 MMcfd which exceeds SoCalGas' take-away capacity at Topock and clearly creates a "mismatch"; and (c) add reference in footnote (2) to the physical capacity of Kern/Mojave at the interconnection with SoCalGas at Wheeler Ridge South, which is in excess of 680 MMcfd even though the metering is currently set to 500 MMcfd.?? The second attachment contains two schematics intended to supplement SoCalGas' draft map of receipt points and interconnections.? These schematics more accurately reflect the actual physical interconnections at Topock and Hector Ridge and correct both the inaccurate impression that the interconnect with? El Paso at Topock consists of several separate pipelines with no cross over, and that inaccurate impression that several interconnections may exist between pipelines at Hector Road .?? El Paso understands and acknowledges that there are a number of possible responses to Administrative Law Judge Biren's request for a late filed exhibit concerning "mismatches" and pipeline capacity upstream and downstream from SoCalGas receipt points.? In the spirit of compromise, El Paso? will not oppose SoCalGas filing an exhibit as proposed 6/16/00 provided it is revised to reflect the changes and additions El Paso has proposed in this e-mail.?? Very truly yours, Edward W. O'Neill, Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP,? One Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104, (415) 398-8080, fax: (415) 398-5584, e-mail ewo@jmbm.com, for El Paso Natural Gas Company. Received: from elpmime02.epenergy.com ([192.53.35.90])? by [MAIL.JMBM.COM] (GroupWise SMTP/MIME daemon 4.1 v3)????? ; Mon, 19 Jun 00 17:21:00 PDT Received: from mailimc.epec.com (unverified) by elpmime02.epenergy.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 19:32:14 -0500 Received: by mailimc.epec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)? id ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 19:32:16 -0500 Message-ID: <567B2EC6CBF6D311877000805FAD64D135D41B@MAIL06A> Return-Receipt-To: "Healy, William H." X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:32:09 -0700 From: "Healy, William H."? To: FergusonM@EPEnergy.com, SF40#c#SF40.NCO#c#EWO@JMBM.COM Cc: McConnK@EPEnergy.com, WeaverJ@EPEnergy.com Subject: RE: SoCalGas' latest revised draft exhibit re upstream and downstream capacity-Forwarded Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_4E163481.4F2E4160" Here is a copy of SoCal's table describing firm capacity to California with the changes we discussed: ?<> In addition, here are the two sketches that help to describe Topock and Hector Road: ?<> ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. ****************************************************************** (See attached file: GIR-exhibitpipe999.xls) (See attached file: Interconnect Sketch.xls)