Message-ID: <472098.1075846710812.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 07:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mbaldwin@igservice.com
To: susan.scott@enron.com
Subject: RE: TW brief.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "mbaldwin" <mbaldwin@igservice.com>
X-To: <Susan.Scott@enron.com>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Gir
X-Origin: SCOTT-S
X-FileName: sscott3.nsf

Susan, I have read your brief. It looks great. Do you think we should
comment about the core having the ability under this settlement to match its
upstream commitments ,i.e. no stranding etc,  . I only raise this issue
because of the judge's desire to insure the core sector receive measurable
benefits from any proposed settlement. Call if you have any questions, Mark
IGS


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Susan.Scott@enron.com [mailto:Susan.Scott@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 1:40 PM
> To: Mbaldwin@igservice.com; Steven.Harris@enron.com
> Subject: TW brief.
>
>
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 07/10/2000
> 03:40 PM ---------------------------
>
>
>  (Embedded
>  image moved
>  to file:      From:  Susan Scott
>  pic06677.pcx) 07/10/2000 03:23 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To:   MDay@GMSSR.com, Jeff Dasovich
> cc:   Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
>
> Subject:  TW brief.
>
> Here is our brief and cover letter, ready to file.
>
> (See attached file: brief.doc)(See attached file: GIR filing
> letter 3s.doc)
>
>