Message-ID: <9845411.1075841552307.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:22:22 -0700 (PDT) From: corry.bentley@enron.com To: cara.semperger@enron.com Subject: RE: Changing short codes now to save us headaches later Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Bentley, Corry X-To: Semperger, Cara X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Semperger, Cara\Deleted Items X-Origin: SEMPERGER-C X-FileName: cara semperger 6-26-02.PST Cara, I've sure enjoyed getting you emails to will regarding the Workspace/Confirmation programs... most of your comments have been right on. I keep having small anxiety attacks when I realize all of the tweaking we'll have for a while. Onward through the fog. Aquila - agree Dukeenetra - DETM Morgan - agree Edison - agree Avista - agree The rest we don't have any contracts with as far as I know. I'll have everyone back next week and re-do some of my testing on the workspace. CB -----Original Message----- From: Semperger, Cara Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 1:41 PM To: Bentley, Corry Subject: Changing short codes now to save us headaches later Hi Corry, Since the new sheets are going to be a little more fussy, and the alias thing harder to fix or maintain, I would like to get the enpower short codes changed to things that are more workable and make sense. See how these grab you: AQUILACORP -- AQUILA (The canadian ones can stay long for differentiation) DUKEENENTRA- DUKE (But is there another Duke that is just Duke already?) MSCAPGP - MORGAN EDISONMISIM - EDISON IDACORPENE - IDACORP PINNACLEWE - PINNACLE AVISTAENE - AVISTA I have a few west specific ones, but wanted to check with you for these. Lemmie know. C