Message-ID: <11386977.1075844451725.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:14:00 -0800 (PST) From: brent.hendry@enron.com Subject: Merril Lynch LATAM UTILITIES: Cemig and Chilean Regualtory Reform 02/2000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Brent Hendry X-To: Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Brazil news X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S X-FileName: sshackle.nsf FYI ---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 28/02/2000 08:14 AM --------------------------- Alexandre Bueno 25/02/2000 07:11 PM To: BCC cc: (bcc: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT) Subject: Merril Lynch LATAM UTILITIES: Cemig and Chilean Regualtory Reform 02/2000 Investment Highlights: * A swift victory in AES/Southern's new federal appeal would be a strong short-term catalyst. Although the STJ should be more politically neutral than the MG courts, at this stage a favorable outcome is still far from assured. * Even if the partners are reinstated under an injunction, the original lawsuit is still expected to run for several years; ongoing conflict with the State will likely weigh on Cemig's fundamental performance and valuation. * Cemig's stock is down by 10% since we initiated coverage on January 13 and, at 5.0x 2001E cash flow, downside risk is now more limited. Considering the ongoing risks, however, we still see more fundamental upside in Copel (ELP; D-1-1-7; US$8 1/16). Fundamental Highlights: * AES/Southern filed a new injunction with the STJ, a federal court in Brasilia. This seems designed to fast-forward the dispute into a more neutral political arena. * A previous direct appeal to the STJ was rejected pending the state ruling. While a similar rejection is possible this time, the STJ could issue its first ruling as early as this week. http://ei-sp-data01/biblioteca/merrill/cemig_02_2000_I.pdf Investment Highlights: * Following the rejection of their second federal appeal today, AES/Southern must now wait for the state court (TJMG) to issue its final verdict before taking further action. * Although a final state court opinion is due imminently, the federal court's latest ruling opens the risk that Minas Gerais will continue stalling the process at the state level. * We still believe that the legal battle will drag on longer than generally expected. In addition, even if the partners are eventually reinstated under an injunction, ongoing conflict with the State (the original lawsuit may run for years) will likely weigh heavily on Cemig's fundamentals and stock performance. Fundamental Highlights: * The STJ, a federal court in Brasilia, today rejected the most recent protective injunction filed by AES/Southern in their battle with the MG government for control of Cemig. * In rejecting AES/Southern's injunction the STJ upheld an action filed by Minas Gerais on Tuesday. The State argued that there were no material developments since STJ's rejection of a similar AES/Southern appeal late last year. http://ei-sp-data01/biblioteca/merrill/cemig_02_2000_II.pdf Investment Highlights: * AES/Southern executives will likely return to Cemig following yesterday's ruling. Even so, ongoing legal conflict with the State and the suspended veto rights will likely weigh on fundamentals and stock performance. * We expect the stock to remain volatile, but essentially range-bound. Periods of optimism are as likely to be offset by disappointment with the protracted ongoing legal process. * Stories of a possible buyout of AES/Southern have circulated recently in the news media. We view these as both improbable and not necessarily positive. Fundamental Highlights: * The latest step in AES/Southern's legal battle with the Minas Gerais government came yesterday with the TJMG (state court) clarifying its previous divided verdict. The outcome effectively confines AES/Southern to a minority shareholder position. * Next steps are contingent on the publication of the official TJMG ruling which may yet take 30 days or more. An appeal to the STJ (federal court) may now be allowed, although further rounds at the state level cannot be ruled out. http://ei-sp-data01/biblioteca/merrill/cemig_02_2000_III.pdf Investment Highlights: * Following two years dominated by drought and corporate activity, regulatory reform will be a key investment driver for the Chilean electric utilities during 2000. On January 25, the National Energy Commission (CNE) published draft legislation which, so far at least, has been met with studied silence on the part of the companies. * With a new Government due to take office on March 11, it is very unlikely that the current draft will be the final one. In addition, the approval process for any new legislation of this nature is likely to take at least several months. Substantial revisions are expected, but to the extent that elements of the draft are eventually incorporated into final legislation, we would see negative investment consequences for most of the leading Chilean electricity stocks. * While aware that the draft is by no means definitive, our intention in this report is to use the proposals as a framework to discuss key regulatory areas where changes to existing legislation are anticipated. http://ei-sp-data01/biblioteca/merrill/chile_02_2000.pdf