Message-ID: <26216596.1075858815250.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 13:25:49 -0700 (PDT) From: tammy.botsford@morganstanley.com To: sara.shackleton@enron.com Subject: Commodity Futures Customer Agreement Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Tammy.Botsford@morganstanley.com@ENRON X-To: Shackleton, Sara X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \SSHACKL (Non-Privileged)\Shackleton, Sara\Inbox X-Origin: Shackleton-S X-FileName: SSHACKL (Non-Privileged).pst Sara, I'm attaching a draft of the futures agreement to "get the ball rolling" again. I believe I have included the terms you indicated were most important. One item I would like to bring to your attention is the arbitration clause. Morgan Stanley prefers to litigate disputes, but I can agree to NFA arbitration rather than litigation. I know New York is our preferred location, and Texas is yours, so I thought that holding the arbitration in Chicago might equally inconvenience us. Please let me know if this works for you. Regards, Tammy - 1_Redline Enron Cust Agr.doc