Message-ID: <18514272.1075844496532.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: james.ginty@enron.com
To: kaye.ellis@enron.com
Subject: Re: Raptor I Avichi
Cc: annmarie.tiller@enron.com, brent.vasconcellos@enron.com, 
	kevin.howard@enron.com, kristina.mordaunt@enron.com, 
	sara.shackleton@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: annmarie.tiller@enron.com, brent.vasconcellos@enron.com, 
	kevin.howard@enron.com, kristina.mordaunt@enron.com, 
	sara.shackleton@enron.com
X-From: James Ginty
X-To: Kaye Ellis
X-cc: AnnMarie Tiller, Brent Vasconcellos, Kevin Howard, Kristina Mordaunt, Sara Shackleton
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

Sara,

1.  Re number of shares - Assume there is one or more Notice Dates for x 
number of shares and a final Termination Date for [1.093,426 - x] shares.  As 
written, would the calculation on the Termination Date be based on (a) 
1,093,426 shares or (b) [1,093,426 - x] shares?  It should be (b), but it 
looks to me like the confirm says (a)?

Am I mis-reading this?

2.  Picky point - but if the final date is both a Notice Date and a 
Termination Date, is the calculation only done once?

Regards

JAG  





	Kaye Ellis@ECT
	08/31/00 01:23 PM
		 
		 To: Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, AnnMarie 
Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Howard/Enron Communications@Enron 
Communications, James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Brent 
Vasconcellos/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Raptor I Avichi

Attached are the final documents: