Message-ID: <11208629.1075844502128.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 03:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: brent.hendry@enron.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com
Subject: Re: weather confirm
Cc: mark.taylor@enron.com, sara.shackleton@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: mark.taylor@enron.com, sara.shackleton@enron.com
X-From: Brent Hendry
X-To: Tana Jones
X-cc: Mark Taylor, Sara Shackleton
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

When the Master does not have the weather modification to the Trade Option 
Exemption representation then I think we should include it in the confirm. Is 
this feasible?





	Tana Jones@ECT
	08/07/2000 10:25 AM
		 
		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent 
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm

Tanya forwarded the attached confirm on to me.  Are we supposed to have that 
weather rep also in confirmations when we trade under a master?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 10:24 AM -----

	Tanya Rohauer
	08/07/2000 10:21 AM
		 
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm


---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 10:17 
AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Diane Anderson @ ENRON                           08/07/2000 10:09 AM
	

To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: weather confirm