Message-ID: <23158745.1075844798999.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT) From: mary.cook@enron.com To: sara.shackleton@enron.com, carol.clair@enron.com, mary.cook@enron.com, frank.sayre@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com Subject: FW: E:mailing vs Faxing Confirmations Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Mary Cook X-To: Sara Shackleton, Carol St Clair, Mary Cook, Frank Sayre, Mark Taylor X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Notes inbox X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S X-FileName: sshackle.nsf Continuing on this matter: I think under ISDA provisions and our Schedule that emailing would be allowed see 9eii. Are you ok with advising Joe that we think emailing is adequate. Cordially, Mary Cook Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal Houston, Texas 77002-7361 (713) 345-7732 (phone) (713) 646-3490 (fax) mary.cook@enron.com ----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 09:43 AM ----- Larry Joe Hunter 04/24/2001 04:02 PM To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: FW: E:mailing vs Faxing Confirmations The Physical Liquids group is proposing that they begin e-mailing Confirmations rather than faxing. Does anyone have any issues with us doing the same for Financial deals? Thanks, Joe Hunter ---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 03:59 PM --------------------------- Samuel Schott 04/24/2001 03:27 PM To: Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sundar Chitradurga/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: FW: E:mailing vs Faxing Confirmations I believe that we should have a meeting on this before we respond. Sundar, when can you meet for a few minutes? Joe, let me know if you would like to attend or conference in. Thanks !! Samuel x3-9890 (GCP) Enron Net Works _ Global Data Management ---------------------- Forwarded by Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 03:19 PM --------------------------- From: Herbert Goodwin/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/24/2001 01:16 PM To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FW: E:mailing vs Faxing Sam, your name was passed along to me as someone that maybe able to help us. We are investigating the prospect of emailing our confirmations vs faxing them and one of the things that came up was the possibility of a drop box email address for the counterparty involved that would be setup in the global counterparty system. Any ideas off the top of your head of what it might take to get this information included in the global counterparty system? -----Original Message----- From: Goodwin, Herbert Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:41 AM To: Flores, Nony Subject: FW: E:mailing vs Faxing Nony, there is some discussing around developing an email process for our confirmations (vs. faxing) and we are wanting to get an opinion from Legal on the proposal. Can you please let me know what Legal's feelings would be about such a process? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Sorenson, Jefferson D. Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 3:07 PM To: Goodwin, Herbert; Loukanis, Linda K. Cc: Stubbs, Shelly; Bruce, Michelle; Denson, Mary Jane; Gonzales, Alexia; Goodwin, Herbert; Harris, Stephanie L; Loukanis, Linda K.; Nelson, Damian; Schultz, Michelle; Scully, James Subject: E:mailing vs Faxing Herbert - Would you please investigate what it would take for us to begin E:mailing our confirmations as opposed to faxing. Check with Legal, Ron Nolte, and Global Counterparty. Linda - let's see about starting Freight off this way. I would like to go this route if possible. thanks, Jeff