Message-ID: <23524227.1075844809016.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:30:00 -0800 (PST)
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
Subject: Pending transactions, Casco qy6450.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Tana Jones
X-To: Sara Shackleton
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

What do you think about Russell's request for a confirm here?  I think this 
is really confusing for our Canadian team.  There must be requirements for 
the LC if it's an upfront LC, we would need a zero threshold.  I just don't 
think this is very straight forward for these poor Candadian girls to figure 
out.  What do you think?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 11:28 AM -----

	Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/27/2001 10:17 AM
		 
		 To: Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Pending transactions, Casco qy6450.1

Please see attached credit sheet for credit language to attach to the confirm.

Thanks
Russell