Message-ID: <18390339.1075844475196.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 04:55:00 -0800 (PST)
From: paul.simons@enron.com
To: mark.elliott@enron.com
Subject: Re: SITA (French company)
Cc: sara.shackleton@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: sara.shackleton@enron.com
X-From: Paul Simons
X-To: Mark Elliott
X-cc: Sara Shackleton
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

ditto




Mark Elliott
07/11/2000 11:21
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Re: SITA (French company)  

Sounds fine to me.

Kind regards

Mark


From: Sara Shackleton on 06/11/2000 15:05 CST
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: SITA (French company)

Hey, guys:  I'm negotiating a rush ISDA for ECTRIC under the law of England 
and Wales.  I believe that Michael drafted originally.

(1)  submission to English courts and waiver of all objections

(2)  setoff  for all events (excluding affiliates) except for Tax Event or 
Tax Event Upon Merger

Are the foregoing acceptable for ECTRIC?

Your immediate response is appreciated as Michael Moulton wants to book deal 
Tuesday,  Nov. 7.


Thanks.  Sara