Message-ID: <7235256.1075844475943.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:46:00 -0800 (PST) From: susan.hopkinson@lovells.com To: sara.shackleton@enron.com Subject: Re: SITA Cc: sharon.lewis@lovells.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: sharon.lewis@lovells.com X-From: "Susan Hopkinson" X-To: X-cc: "Sharon Lewis" X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Notes inbox X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S X-FileName: sshackle.nsf CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. ---------------------------------------------------------------- How about Thursday at 15:30? ? Susan >>> 11/4/2000 00:36:50 >>> Susan:? How about any of Wednesday - Friday, Nov.8, 9 or 10?? Houston is on Central Std. Time.? Let me know.?S ara ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????? "Susan Hopkinson"???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????? ??????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????? vells.com>???????????????? cc:???? , ????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????? Subject:???? Re: SITA???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????? 11/03/2000 05:38 AM???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????? CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your email Sara.? When would you like to do? the conferencec all next week? I cannot do Monday, but any other time should be? fine. Maybe if you give me a couple of times that suit you then I can picko ne?? I would like my colleague Sharon Lewis to be free as well if? possible. Susan >>> 11/3/2000 01:33:15? >>> Susan:? Sorry for the delay in getting back to? you.? We have agreed to delete the CSA and will return a blackline to? you shortly.? You may recall that SITAe xpressly requested that theE nron agreement be governed by English law which is why we prepared thisd ocument for execution by our affiliate in London with the jurisdictionl anguage appearing in the prior draft.? There are still issues posed by? your markup and we should be able to schedule a conference call next? week.? Thanks.?? Sara ???????????????????? "Susan? Hopkinson" ???????????????????? ???????????????????? vells.com>????????????????? cc: ??????????????????????????????????????????????? Subject:????? SITA ???????????????????? 10/09/2000 03:27? AM CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are? confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named? recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose? the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy? the information in any? medium. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Further? to my fax of 3 October we have SITA's instructions. 1 - Credit Support? Annex : SITA's position is unchanged. SITA does not wish to have a Credit? Support Annex.? SITA have asked that ENRON come up with a proposal on? the term and volume of the transactions on the basis of no Credit Support? Annex. 2 - SITA does not provide investment services ancillary to its? main activities. Do you have any news regarding ENRON on this? point? Kind regards Susan? Hopkinson ---------------------------------------------------------------- Lovells? (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and Boesebeck Droste, practising as? Lovells Boesebeck Droste in some jurisdictions) is an international lawf irm. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email,p lease? contact the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296? 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in some jurisdictions) is an international lawf irm. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in some jurisdictions) is an international law firm. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000.