Message-ID: <4989003.1075844546271.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: jarrod.cyprow@enron.com
Subject: Re: Southern
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Sara Shackleton
X-To: Jarrod Cyprow
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

Jarrod:  that language works fine.  Sara


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Jarrod Cyprow                           04/04/2000 03:12 PM
	

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Southern

For a deal with Southern they would like to amend the true up period to be 90 
days. 

This is some language we used on an older deal under Special Provisions:

For purposes of this Transaction, the phrase "within 30 calendar days" in 
line 5 of Section 7.3 of the Commodity Definitions shall be replaced by the 
phrase "within 90 calendar days."

Is it O.K. to use this again.



---------------------- Forwarded by Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 03:07 
PM ---------------------------


Bob Crane
04/04/2000 02:08 PM
To: Steve Kim/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Lisa Berg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
John Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert 
Richard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul 
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  
Subject: deal 4 apr 2000