Message-ID: <32686667.1075844562038.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: robert.bruce@enron.com
Subject: FX Transactions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Sara Shackleton
X-To: Robert Bruce
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 04:22 PM -----

	Trena McFarland
	08/10/2000 10:04 AM
		 
		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: FX Transactions

file attached below
---------------------- Forwarded by Trena McFarland/LON/ECT on 10/08/2000 
16:06 ---------------------------


Jon Barrett@MGLTD
07/08/2000 11:46
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Sid 
Tipples/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Andrew 
Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT 

Subject: FX Transactions

We received the attached from Sullivan & Cromwell re the FX business and the 
possibilities of using a US companyn which company to use for contract 
purposes. At a meeting here at MG today, the consensus/preference was not to 
use a UK company as we have no full ISD (chapter 10) firm nor the wish to 
change MG's status.

Per the advice from S&C, we like the idea of using a US corporation with a UK 
"arranger" to cover any UK regulatory issues that arise. Dependent on where 
the business will end up (I understand to be discussed by Gary Hickerson/Mike 
Hutchinson 18th August), the following appears to be the among the logical 
solutions:

1. Contractual entity - either Enron North America, MG London Inc or Newco 
Inc.
2. Arranger - either EEFT Ltd, Metallgesellschaft Ltd or MG Brokers Ltd 
(depending on the effect on their chapter 3 status for the last two).

The current customer base consists of entities in the US, Canada, France, UK 
and Switzerland.

Please advise on any group/tax issues that can affect the final decision. If 
you need any further information, please let me know.

Many thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on 
07/08/2000 15:59 ---------------------------


GILBERGD@sullcrom.com on 06/08/2000 15:45:55
To: jbarrett
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com 

Subject: FX Transactions



eSafe Protect Gateway (tm) has scanned this mail for viruses, vandals and
suspicious attachments and has found it to be CLEAN.

File: 62cy01!.DOC (38,400 bytes)
Encoding: Base64
Result: Clean.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attached is a draft of the memo we discussed on the proposed FX business. 
Please call or e-mail with any questions.  Best regards.


----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - 62cy01!.DOC