Message-ID: <27145092.1075844563322.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 02:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: stephanie.panus@enron.com
Subject: Re: Bank of Montreal ("BOM")
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Sara Shackleton
X-To: Stephanie Panus
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

How are we handling the "dual agreement" situation?  Have we spoken with 
credit?



	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	08/21/2000 09:09 AM
		
		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Bank of Montreal ("BOM")

There is an executed Assignment Agreement transfering CES's transactions with 
Bank of Montreal to ENA.  The CES Master Agreement was not terminated, but is 
inactive.


From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 08/21/2000 08:56 AM
To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Bank of Montreal ("BOM")

Re:  Bank of Montreal and ENA, have we terminated the CES agreement (and has 
credit agreed)?  I don't know how Susan F. "inactivated" the CES ISDA with 
BOM,  We are in the process of negotiating with BOM in connection with our 
Japanese affiliate.  Sara