Message-ID: <23462361.1075844517817.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 10:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: rbaird@velaw.com
Subject: Review of ECT's "omnibus" form of confirmation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Sara Shackleton
X-To: rbaird@velaw.com
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

Attached is our form of confirm with attached Annex A (general terms and 
conditions).  Assume the confirm is governed by Texas law.  Most 
counterparties sign the confirm and fax it back to us WITHOUT the attached 
Annex A.  Is this sufficient under Texas law as having received the 
"executed" confirmation?  Do we need to modify our language incorporating the 
Annex A?  Thanks.  Sara (713/853-5620)