Message-ID: <18754291.1075844574867.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:13:00 -0800 (PST)
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: dale.neuner@enron.com
Subject: Re: EOL FX transactions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Sara Shackleton
X-To: Dale Neuner
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

Dale:  do you still want to meet?  Are you waiting to receive Janine's email 
tomorrow?  Can I buy you lunch one day?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000 04:11 PM -----

	Janine Juggins
	11/09/2000 11:18 AM
		
		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: EOL FX transactions

I will respond tomorrow (including charts !). I have left a voicemail with 
Dale.
Reagrds
Janine


From: Sara Shackleton on 08/11/2000 17:39 CST
To: Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: EOL FX transactions

Janine:  Thank you for scheduling the meeting last week.  Let me know if I 
can be of any help whatsoever.  Also, whatever flowcharts or schematics you 
can offer would greatly appreciated, as well as a list of services agreements.

Dale Neuner is anxious to resolve the issues surrounding FX transactions on 
EOL.  Have you concluded that we need RMT as the EOL party for internal 
hedging FX products for London and Japan.  Am I correct in the following?

RMT will be the party transacting directly with international Enron 
affiliates (i.e., ECTRIC, through EEFT, and Enron Japan) under new/existing 
services agreements. 
ENA will be the financial party transacting directly with third parties.  
Does ENA also act directly with non-affiliated Japanese customers (if the 
situation should arise?)

Thanks.  Sara