Message-ID: <11495917.1075844915671.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 11:33:00 -0800 (PST) From: sara.shackleton@enron.com To: caroline.abramo@enron.com Subject: RE: POA/ Cargill line... Cc: wendi.lebrocq@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: wendi.lebrocq@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com X-From: Sara Shackleton X-To: Caroline Abramo X-cc: Wendi LeBrocq, Mark Taylor X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S X-FileName: sshackle.nsf Caroline: Sorry I wasn't able to reach you today and I will be out of the office tomorrow. If this can wait until Monday, please contact my assistant Kaye Ellis (X35968) and get on my calendar early Monday. If this cannot wait, please contact Mark Taylor (X37459) and he may be able to find a lawyer to assist you. In general, I thought that Wendi was waiting to hear back from Cargill Incorporated credit. Once we understood what Cargill was looking for, I was hoping to speak with their lawyer and agree to eliminate all of the provisions appearing in the draft POA which did not really concern ENA. Recall that ENA does not want to monitor Cargill's agent: that's an internal job for Cargill. I hope that we can speak on Monday. Maybe you can coordinate tomorrow with Wendi. Thanks. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com Caroline Abramo@ENRON 03/07/2001 06:09 PM To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: RE: POA/ Cargill line... Sara- I am going to suggest to Cargill that we will call them before any deal with Global gets booked.. they will have to approve it.. and then I'll go ahead with the Global deal... they will have to strip out all the references to the line... need to ask you a few other things though.... ---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 07:07 PM --------------------------- Joe_Lardy@cargill.com on 03/02/2001 10:39:03 AM To: Caroline.Abramo@enron.com cc: dlm@globaladvisors.co.uk, Sara.Shackleton@enron.com, Wendi.LeBrocq@enron.com Subject: RE: POA/ Cargill line... Currently Cargill and Enron have a 15MM collateral threshold. If possible, I think the cleanest way to run this biz would be to put a box around the prime broker biz. We would still operate under the master isda but could set up a mutually agreeable credit support annex for this biz. We would still keep the 20,000,000 line referenced in Schedule B of the POA agreement. The line in the POA is a seperate and distinct measure from the daily collateral. The 20 mill reflects gross exposure. Let me know if you think this is reasonable and workable. We too, are open to suggestion as the Global and Enron relationships are very important and a high priority to us. Thanks Joe -----Original Message----- From: Caroline.Abramo@enron.com [mailto:Caroline.Abramo@enron.com] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 7:26 AM To: lardy, joe /xtwn Cc: dlm@globaladvisors.co.uk; Wendi.LeBrocq@enron.com; Sara.Shackleton@enron.com Subject: POA/ Cargill line... Joe- a few things regading the POA/ Cargill line.. I am going to find out how much line we currently have available... you probably already have this. We should allocate a piece to Global which would solve the problem of other Cargill people using the line, putting us over the limit, without me knowing... We could change the language of the POA to this... we will not go over Global's piece of the Cargill line...I think this would solve our main concern... Please let me know... we are eager to keep trading with Global and yourselves... Regards, Caroline