Message-ID: <24395623.1075844541431.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 06:33:00 -0800 (PST)
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: marie.heard@enron.com
Subject: BPAmoco Corp / Amoco Corp
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Sara Shackleton
X-To: Marie Heard
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

I think that the reference may be in the setoff clause and the CP was trying 
to exclude "other Transactions" and limit setoff to derivatives only.  
Unfortunately, I don't have the form with me.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000 
02:28 PM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Willie Harrell                           02/29/2000 09:46 AM
	

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie 
Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana 
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: BPAmoco Corp / Amoco Corp

I have forwarded to Marie Heard by interoffice mail a copy of deal NA1573.1.  
Whomever is available to review this confirm please check   Annex  A , page 
2, paragraph #5, line #5;  c/p added the word "derivatives" between the words 
"such - amount".  Back on 3/3/1999  legal  did  not  approve  this  same 
request  by these same counterparties.  Has  there been any  change in this 
opinion?  I  am  currently  holding every executed confirm received from 
these counterparties because  of  this  discrepancy.  Please advise asap.  
Thanks,  Willie, 3-9226