Message-ID: <265921.1075858810317.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:50:40 -0700 (PDT) From: sara.shackleton@enron.com To: stephanie.panus@enron.com Subject: FW: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Shackleton, Sara X-To: Panus, Stephanie X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \SSHACKL (Non-Privileged)\Shackleton, Sara\Sent Items X-Origin: Shackleton-S X-FileName: SSHACKL (Non-Privileged).pst Stephanie: Exelon is fine as is. Thanks. Sara -----Original Message----- From: Vanek, Darren Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:46 PM To: Shackleton, Sara Subject: FW: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Sara, Itrust Ed's opinion on this one! -----Original Message----- From: Sacks, Edward Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:37 PM To: Vanek, Darren; Conwell, Wendy; Ngo, Tracy Subject: RE: Exelon Generation Company, LLC The "reg out" is not applicable for these guys. Its generally used on municipal cps. -e -----Original Message----- From: Vanek, Darren Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:21 PM To: Conwell, Wendy; Sacks, Edward; Ngo, Tracy Subject: FW: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Any input guys? I am unfamiliar with a "regulatory out" provision. -d -----Original Message----- From: Shackleton, Sara Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:16 PM To: Vanek, Darren Cc: Panus, Stephanie Subject: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Darren: I've just reviewed this credit worksheet for a first draft ISDA. Is this the type of counterparty for which a "regulatory out" MAC provision is appropriate? I am not familiar with Exelon's business. I know this event was used in some of Tracy's ISDA's with northwest utilities. Sara Sara Shackleton Enron Wholesale Services 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a Houston, TX 77002 Ph: (713) 853-5620 Fax: (713) 646-3490