Message-ID: <890408.1075863196042.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:52:56 -0800 (PST)
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: sibyl.peyer@gs.com
Subject: RE: new account agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Shackleton, Sara </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SSHACKL>
X-To: '"Peyer, Sibyl" <sibyl.peyer@gs.com>@ENRON'
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \SSHACKL (Non-Privileged)\Shackleton, Sara\Sent Items
X-Origin: Shackleton-S
X-FileName: SSHACKL (Non-Privileged).pst


sybil:  can we conference you in with Ted and Enron treasury?????????
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Peyer, Sibyl" <sibyl.peyer@gs.com>@ENRON  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: new account agreement

Never mind...I got it.  THanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peyer, Sibyl
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 5:33 PM
To: 'Shackleton, Sara'
Subject: RE: new account agreement


I'm getting stuff from Ted.  Looks like the repo annex is missing.  Pls get
executed if not already in package.  Thanks.


-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 5:23 PM
To: Peyer, Sibyl
Subject: FW: new account agreement


Sibyl:  We are faxing signature pages now.
We have confirmation that the prior fax (in its entirety) went through.

Call if you have a problem.
Sara

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Shackleton, Sara
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:30 PM
> To:	'"Peyer, Sibyl" <sibyl.peyer@gs.com>@ENRON'
> Subject:	RE: new account agreement
>
> Sibyl:  We are faxing docs now.  Sara
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron Wholesale Services
> 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
> Houston, TX  77002
> Ph:  (713) 853-5620
> Fax: (713) 646-3490
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Peyer, Sibyl" <sibyl.peyer@gs.com>@ENRON
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:13 PM
> To:	Shackleton, Sara
> Subject:	RE: new account agreement
>
> Tried to call with more questions:
> Where is the money coming from?
> Why is this trade being done out of this entity and not Enron Corp
> like the
> others?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peyer, Sibyl
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:42 PM
> To: 'Shackleton, Sara'
> Subject: RE: new account agreement
>
>
> Hi Sara
> No one here seems to know anything about ERMT Corp.
> Can you confirm it's not a regulated entity?  (Public Utility, etc.)
> Can we get a copy of its Cert. of Incorporation (whatever you have in
> your
> files is fine.)
> Anything else you can tell me about the activity of the entity would
> also be
> helpful.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shackleton, Sara [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:57 PM
> To: Peyer, Sibyl
> Subject: new account agreement
>
>
> Sibyl:
>
> Did you want me to dupe the Enron Corp. documents, i.e., change
> signature lines?
> I have a copy of the Corporate Account Agreement (including the
> Schedule) but not the Repo.
>
> Thanks.  Sara
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron Wholesale Services
> 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
> Houston, TX  77002
> Ph:  (713) 853-5620
> Fax: (713) 646-3490
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and
> may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply
> to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all
> copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> not
> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be
> relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise.
> Thank you.
> **********************************************************************