Subject: RE: EOL Amendment
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], legal <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:57:34 -0700 (PDT)

Kim:  Sorry for the mixup.  Attached is my redlined version of Stacy's form.  Do we need to add references to crude?  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Theriot, Kim S.  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Moore, Janet H.
Subject:	FW: EOL Amendment

Sara,
Attached is the EOL Amendment that Stacy Dickson has already prepared for Texaco and sent to Mark.  Power does not need to see it as stated below since Power does not do any business with Texaco.  Can you incorporate your financial comments into the version below?

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dickson, Stacy E.  
Sent:	Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:47 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Cc:	Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	EOL Amendment

Mark, 
Attached is an EOL Amendment for the Texaco entities.  EPMI does not trade power with Texaco so Janet does not need to see this amendment.

Stacy 

 << File: EOLTexacoamend.doc >>