Message-ID: <26721931.1075857525603.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 06:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeffrey.shankman@enron.com
To: christian.lebroc@enron.com
Subject: Re: Liquids Limits Oct.25
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jeffrey A Shankman
X-To: Christian LeBroc
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Jeffrey_Shankman_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Shankman-J
X-FileName: jshankm.nsf

Do you agree?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 
01:12 PM ---------------------------


John L Nowlan
10/26/2000 12:55 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Liquids Limits Oct.25  

Jeff this is no violation at all. These are arbitrary limits that were put in 
to give us a feel for where our exposure is. We have just changed the 
methodology of these,so the big move in the product numbers. 


To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Liquids Limits Oct.25  

Is this a violation, or are we just shifting portfolios around.  Jeff


   
	
	
	From:  Christian LeBroc @ ENRON                           10/26/2000 10:58 AM
	

To: Hugo Moreira/LON/ECT@ECT, David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L 
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, John Buckner 
Thomas/SIN/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Risk Controls@ECT, Mary 
Thambiah/LON/ECT@ECT, Oliver Gaylard/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn 
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Manfred Roenz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee 
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT, John 
Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Horn/LON/ECT@ECT, 
Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Liquids Limits Oct.25