Message-ID: <24937717.1075857528927.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 07:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeffrey.shankman@enron.com
To: john.nowlan@enron.com
Subject: Re: Euell Energy Issue
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jeffrey A Shankman
X-To: John L Nowlan
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Jeffrey_Shankman_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Shankman-J
X-FileName: jshankm.nsf

ok.




John L Nowlan
10/12/2000 02:29 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  
Subject: Re: Euell Energy Issue  

Jeff,Eric   Platt's just reporting what Euell said so they really have no 
reason to aplogize, other than to us for running a story with our name with 
no confirmation as to the validity of what was said. I do not think it a good 
idea for us to be saying too much about this publically and being too 
defensive as it may be interpreted wrongly. I agree with Eric' s decision 
which will be confirmed by  Mark Palmer that we keep our reply to the WSJ 
where we can have some comfort that the facts will be properly reported.