Message-ID: <21013609.1075852635092.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 01:59:52 -0700 (PDT) From: joseph.hirl@enron.com To: mike.mcconnell@enron.com, a..shankman@enron.com Subject: Sato MOU and Deal List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: Hirl, Joseph X-To: Mcconnell, Mike , Shankman, Jeffrey A. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JSHANKM (Non-Privileged)\Deleted Items X-Origin: Skilling-J X-FileName: JSKILLIN (Non-Privileged).pst Mike/Jeff, =20 Jeremy will be sending you the updated internal deal list to give you a fee= l for the types of things we are working on and where we stand. We'd like = to discuss this further with you. I think you will see from the types of t= ransactions and the relative value that the 2002 plan numbers are not unrea= listic. However, in order to achieve these numbers will require some stron= g support from Houston and additional expat staff. We have focused on reas= onableness of the size of transactions that we are seeing to date and what = we would additionally plan to see. We have also focused on trying to do mo= re with less (Sato proposition) and shooting for just north of break even. = Additionally, I am under the belief that you are stretching all of the gro= ups and anything less than covering costs would not be acceptable. While S= ato would not be required to achieve these numbers, it would certainly be e= asier with them. (... don't mean for this to be interpreted that we should= have higher numbers with Sato...). =20 Sato: We'd like to set a time to speak with you about Sato MOU your Thursday (our= Friday). Our 0730 is your 1730. Would this work for you? =20 =20 Joe